Topic: State Water Resource Control Board’s Economic Feasibility Analysis in Consideration of a Hexavalent Chromium Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) White Paper.
Thank you to all who helped CalMutuals take action with the State Water Resources Control Board to ensure true economic feasibility guidelines associated with new MCLs.
Your participation in the public workshop on April 27th represented 39% of all public participants; and comment letters that were due on May 15th make an important difference in making the case for adoption of a formal state water board policy on economic feasibility
Summary: CalMutuals has the position that the White Paper does not adequately address the issues cited by the Courtin invalidating the previous standard for hexavalent chromium. The premise of the White Paper should not be the basis for adopting a new MCL for hexavalent chromium or any other contaminant. Instead, the State Water Board should consider the public testimony and written comments to direct the formulation of a formal policy on economic feasibility that will truly protect the integrity of the safe drinking water standards it adopts.
Topic: Options for Implementation of a Statewide Low-income Water Rate Assistance Program
AB 401 (Dodd) was passed in 2016, requiring the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), in collaboration with the State Board of Equalization to develop a plan for funding and implementing the Low-Income Water Rate Assistance Program. CalMutuals has been involved since the beginning of the implementation planning process of a low-income rate assistance program. Please read our comment letter below.
Topic: CalMutuals Comment Letter about Governor Newsom Draft Resiliency Portfolio lacking Affordability
The Governor recently released his draft resiliency water portfolio which provides a comprehensive road map for progress on many fronts to achieve water supply reliability throughout the state but does not effectively define what it means to achieve “resiliency.” CalMutuals believes that vulnerability must be rated by the success of the smallest water system in terms of size and wealth. Please read our comment letter for our complete position.
Topic: University of California Riverside Affordability Study
University of California, Riverside has recently completed a study and held a symposium in which they attempted to gauge the affordability of water throughout the state mainly using their Water Expenditure Ratio calculation and discussion the possible implications of those findings.
Here Are A Few Highlights
- The study attempts to take into account the proportion of residents’ income that is spent on water and sewage to determine whether water is affordable, and whether a Low-Income Rate Assistance (LIRA) program should be implemented.
- UCR makes a distinction to use the median household incomes of a specific block or neighborhood in order to get a more accurate idea of the burden shouldered by certain communities.
- Research showed that at least within Eastern Municipal Service District there is an inverse trend between higher incomes and lower ratios of incomes spent on water.
- Panelist Adan Ortega urged the group to consider the building blocks of affordability as a whole in order to fully understand the situation and understand that our choices guide affordability. The building blocks include the age of infrastructure, sources of water supply, cultural drivers, community standards, and confidence in the safety of the water supply.
- While expenditure ratios partially explain the trends, Mr. Ortega contended that the burdens placed on disadvantaged communities without access to healthy water cause them to make more expensive choices.
- A distrust of the tap water can cause disadvantaged households to spend 600x more on bottled water.
- While a LIRA program may be helpful for many communities, Mr. Ortega urges the state to consider the deeper forces driving affordability issues.
Bill of Interest:
SB 974 (Hurtado) California Enviromental Quality Act: small community water System; exemption
Sponsors: Self-Help Enterprises and Rural Community Assistance Corporation
Summary: SB 974 exempts from CEQA review drinking water projects benefiting public water systems serving small disadvantaged communities and schools in an attempt to uphold the State’s Commitment to the Human Rights to Water. Specifically this legislation creates a narrow statutory exemption for community water systems serving a DAC community with fewer than 10 thousand people and public water systems owned and operated by schools that serve a DAC community.